DL&G Douglas, Leonard & Garvey, P.C.
 
  Our Blog    

Archive for the ‘Snowmobile Accidents’ Category


Surgical Mistakes are Commonplace

Monday, January 7th, 2013
By C. Kevin Leonard – New Hampshire Personal Injury Attorney

A recent study suggests that dangerous medical errors happen more frequently than you might care to believe. Researchers reporting their findings online in the journal Surgery note that “never events” occur frequently.

In the medical community, the so-called “never event” refers to certain medical mistakes that should never occur. These mistakes include leaving an instrument inside a patient, operating on the wrong body part or performing the wrong procedure. While some type of mistakes in health care are considered not preventable, these “never events” are preventable.

The study’s findings are based on research covering 1990-2010. It is estimated that a surgeon in the United States left a foreign object (such as a sponge) inside a patient 39 times a week, performed the wrong procedure on a patient 20 times a week and operated on the wrong body part 20 times a week.

When you undergo a surgery, you expect it to go smoothly. Most times it does. Based on the study, patients receiving the wrong procedure had the highest odds of death or injury and younger patients had a better chance of surviving a “never event” than those over the age of 60. Patients between the ages of 40 and 49 had the most “never events.”

If you believe you are the victim of medical malpractice, you should consult a medical malpractice attorney such as one of the attorneys at Douglas, Leonard & Garvey, P.C. Call us at 1-800-240-1988 or fill out our online contact form.

C. Kevin Leonard, Partner

Contact C. Kevin Leonard for a free case evaluation:
1-800-240-1988 or kleonard@nhlawoffice.com

Caps on Medical Malpractice Damages – Not in New Hampshire

Monday, January 7th, 2013
By C. Kevin Leonard – New Hampshire Medical Malpractice Attorney

With the problem of rising health care costs, in the news over the past couple of years are efforts in certain states to impose caps on the amount of damages a medical malpractice victim can recover. Those in favor of such caps argue that the limitation will help with health care costs. There are published studies that reveal such a claim is not supported.

While caps have been passed in other states, the New Hampshire Supreme Court rejected imposing such caps over 30 years ago in response to the New Hampshire Legislature’s law to limit the amount of damages recoverable for non-economic loss (pain and suffering) to $250,000.

In 1979, Carsen v. Maurer, the New Hampshire Supreme Court ruled that the cap was unconstitutional. In Carsen v. Mauer, the Court noted such a law treated victims of medical negligence different from victims of other kinds of negligence by restricting the damages they may recover for their injuries.

If you believe you have been the victim of a personal injury or medical malpractice, you should consult an experienced medical malpractice lawyer such as one of the attorneys at Douglas, Leonard & Garvey, P.C. Call us at 1-800-240-1988 or fill out our online contact form.

C. Kevin Leonard, Partner

Contact C. Kevin Leonard for a free case evaluation:
1-800-240-1988 or kleonard@nhlawoffice.com


Caps on Personal Injury Damages – Not in New Hampshire

Sunday, January 6th, 2013
By C. Kevin Leonard – New Hampshire Personal Injury Attorney

In a previous blog, we explained that in 1980 the New Hampshire Supreme Court rejected the legislature’s attempt to impose a $250,000 cap on pain and suffering or non-economic losses. Well, in 1990, those in favor of limiting such damage awards were back at it.

This time, the proponents wanted to impose a statutory cap of $875,000 for non-economic loss in all personal injury cases, which would include medical malpractice cases. Although the cap amount was higher, the Court rejected the idea of having a cap itself. In Birannigan v. Usitalo, the New Hampshire Supreme Court noted it was “unfair and unreasonable” to impose such a burden (limit on damages) on those severely injured and in need of compensation.

In this time of rising health care costs, it is easy to come up with a simplistic (although incorrect) solution to the problem and target victims of personal injury. Our Supreme Court has rejected as unconstitutional previous efforts to single out personal injury victims with arbitrary caps or limits on their right to recovery non-economic or pain and suffering damages.

If you believe you have been the victim of a personal injury, you should consult an experienced medical malpractice or personal injury lawyer such as one of the attorneys at Douglas, Leonard & Garvey, P.C. Call us at 1-800-240-1988 or fill out our online contact form.

C. Kevin Leonard, Partner

Contact C. Kevin Leonard for a free case evaluation:
1-800-240-1988 or kleonard@nhlawoffice.com


SCHOOL BUS REAR-ENDS CAR STOPPED AT RED LIGHT

Wednesday, December 12th, 2012
By C. Kevin Leonard – New Hampshire Personal Injury Attorney

Recently, a woman and her teenage daughter were transported to the hospital after their car was rear-ended by a school bus in Manchester, New Hampshire.

None of the children on the bus were injured. But the driver and passenger in the car complained of neck and back injuries and were taken to the hospital.

Rear-end collisions are a frequent type of car accident in New Hampshire. These accidents happen even when, like the bus driver in this case, drivers are supposed to be paying attention and on the look-out. Like the victims in this accident, they were not at fault but now are injured and require medical treatment. This means they will also have medical bills and maybe lost wages.

Insurance companies hire adjusters and lawyers to protect them so it is important for accident victims to protect their rights. If you have been injured in a motor vehicle accident caused by the other driver, you need an experienced personal injury attorney to help you. You should consult one of the car accident lawyers at Douglas, Leonard & Garvey, P.C. by calling us at 1-800-240-1988 or fill out our online contact form.

RESPONSIBILITY OR “LIABILITY” FOR PERSONAL INJURY – PART II

Wednesday, September 26th, 2012

By Jason R.L. Major Personal Injury Lawyer

If you have a duty to someone who might foreseeably be harmed by whatever you are doing, what is the scope of that duty? The law simple requires you to act reasonably in proportion to harm that would be caused if you get it wrong. As Justice Cardozo stated, the risk can you can perceive defines the duty you must obey. You can think of it kind of like a sliding scale. The more risky the act you are engaged in is to others, the more careful you must be.

To put in real life terms, driving down a four lane highway with only one other car in sight requires you to exercise a certain degree of care and diligence to avoid a collision that might injure someone. Driving down a four lane highway with 40 or 50 cars in sight all around you likely requires a much greater degree of care and diligence on your part to avoid a collision that might injure someone. Keeping a flat, heavily textured walkway to your door reasonably safe for visitors requires a certain level of care and diligence in maintenance. Keeping stairs or a ramped walkway in a safe condition requires more attention to detail and regular maintenance.

The way to avoid being liable for something you do is really pretty simple. If it feels risky, it probably is, so think of how to make it safer. Even if it doesn’t feel risky, it does not hurt to take an extra second or so to look at what you are doing objectively and judge whether you could do it in a way that is safer for others. Sometimes that is as simple as putting down your sunshade when driving into the sun. Other times it may require you to think a bit more deliberately about the pros and cons of your activities. Note that the law does not require you to be perfect. It requires you to exercise reasonable care in relation to the risk of what you are doing. So the more dangerous it is, the more deliberate you must be in finding a safe way to accomplish whatever “it” is.

If you have been injured because of the fault of someone else, contact Douglas, Leonard & Garvey, P.C. at 1-800-240-1988 or fill out our online contact form to see if one of our experienced personal injury lawyers may be able to help you.

RESPONSIBILITY OR “LIABILITY” FOR PERSONAL INJURY – PART I

Tuesday, September 25th, 2012

By Jason R.L. MajorPersonal Injury Lawyer

A non-lawyer co-worker recently asked me a question about the concept of “liability.” The question went something like this: “You lawyers are always talking about liability, but how does a regular person with no legal training know if I’ll be liable for something I do?”

Now, this is a broad question so it would be impossible to give a “one-size-fits-all” test answer. However, if we’re talking about normal, everyday life – the things one does every day like driving, walking through crowds, maintaining your home or place of work, and otherwise interacting with other people, there is an underlying concept which defines whether you might be legally liable to someone else for something you do.

First of all, the idea of “being liable” to someone presupposes a “tort claim,” which is a claim you make for recovery of damages when someone does something (or fails to do something that they should have) and you are injured as a result. There are four primary elements to any tort claim. They are (1) a duty, (2) a breach of that duty, (3) that is the cause of (4) an injury. For the purposes of this discussion, we’ll concentrate on the concept of duty. Through her question, my co-worker was really asking “what is the duty I have to others to avoid being held liable if something goes wrong?”

Under New Hampshire law, whether you have a duty to others is controlled by the concept of “foreseeability.” Justice Cardozo, a famous judge from New York, said in an equally famous (at least to lawyers) case back in 1928 that “[t]he risk reasonably to be perceived defines the duty to be obeyed.” What does that mean? Basically it means that you have to take an objective look at what you are doing, judge whether it presents a risk to others, and do what is reasonable to mitigate that risk. In other words, if you can foresee that not being careful in whatever task you are doing might cause harm to someone, you have a “duty” to anyone who you can foresee being harmed.

If you have been injured because of the fault of someone else, contact Douglas, Leonard & Garvey, P.C. at 1-800-240-1988 or fill out our online contact form to see if one of our experienced personal injury lawyers may be able to help you.

DEFENSE MEDICAL EXAMINATION IS NOT AN INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION

Friday, June 24th, 2011

Filing a personal injury or workers’ compensation claim can be complicated and there are many different steps involved before the case is resolved. One of these steps may involve an examiner by a medical examiner, which is a doctor hired by the defendant’s insurance company. This is sometimes referred to as an “independent” medical examination but that is not accurate. Instead, this examination should be called a Defense Medical Examination.

It’s important to keep in mind that the medical examiner is NOT your doctor and they were hired to assist the defense in disproving your claim or minimizing the extent of your injuries. Given this fact, you should be prepared by your lawyer ahead of time and know what to expect before your appointment so that you don’t do anything that might hurt your case.

Here are a few suggestions:

Be concise when answering questions. When asked about your pain or symptoms, state them clearly and concisely. Rambling on may result in your saying the wrong thing, or mentioning something that may hurt your case in the long run. Keep it to the point and you will be fine.

Be polite and cooperative. There is no need to be hostile with the medical examiner, even though you know they are not on your side. Be as pleasant as you can and do as he or she asks. For example, if the doctor requests that you bend or twist, do so to the best of your ability but within your limits.

Avoid exaggeration. The medical examiner is looking for people who get carried away when describing their pain. Going overboard may make you appear to be dishonest or exaggerating will only hurt your case.

Know your condition and don’t minimize it. Although it’s good to be concise in your answers, you should also be sure not to leave out anything important when it involves your pain and symptoms. Be specific and accurate in your list of limitations and complaints so that everything important is properly documented.

Understand the details of your claim. The medical examiner may ask you specific questions about your case, like the date of the incident, the details of what happened, or the names of doctors you have consulted with. Know this information ahead of time so that you’re prepared and confident.

Try not to be emotional. Certainly the experience of being injured can be emotional, and dealing with the pain and suffering is upsetting. But try to stay as focused as possible when meeting with the medical examiner. Leaving the emotion out of it can make the visit go much more quickly and smoothly.

Be honest. If a medical attorney has agreed that you are, in fact, a victim, there should be no reason to lie or stretch the truth when visiting with an independent medical examiner. Doing so will only serve to hurt your case so remember to keep it honest.

These are just a few suggestions to help prepare you for this part of your case. An experienced personal injury or workers’ compensation attorney from Douglas, Leonard & Garvey, will sit down with you to discuss your concerns and answer any questions you may have before you go to the appointment. Being prepared and knowing what to expect can make a difference between a winning case or a loss. Call our office at 1-800-240-1988 or fill out our contact form online.

NEW HAMPSHIRE SNOWMOBILERS SUFFER SERIOUS INJURIES

Thursday, March 3rd, 2011

This year’s winter conditions have meant many people have been able to participate in a variety of winter activities, including snowmobiling. Snowmobiling is a lot of fun and with it comes a certain level of responsibility.  This means abiding by certain rules to avoid injuring yourself or others.  So far this year there have been many reports of  snowmobilers suffering serious personal injuries, including fatalities, from snowmobile accidents.

Guess what is the most common cause of snowmobile accidents?  According to the New Hampshire Fish & Game, riders need to stay on designated trails and keep their speeds down.  In two recent accidents, witnesses claim the drivers were operating at a speed greater than necessary to safely operate the snowmobiles.   One driver was killed while the other driver was left unconscious.

These snowmobile accidents remind us of the serious consequences from personal injuries.  Even less serious accidents than a fatality can have a long-term impact on accident victims and their families. So, remember, while you are enjoying yourself in whatever winter activity you are doing, please be safe and responsible.

If you are the victim of an accident or personal injury, please contact us if you need an experienced New Hampshire personal injury lawyer.

 
TOP
Douglas, Leonard & Garvey, P.C. attorneys represent clients in courts throughout New Hampshire, including Concord, Manchester, Nashua, Salem, Rochester, Portsmouth, Laconia, Plymouth, Franklin, Keene, Lebanon, Littleton, Hampton, Hooksett, Derry, Claremont, Goffstown, North Conway, Exeter, Durham, Plaistow, Henniker, Newport, Milford, Merrimack, Hillsborough, Bow, Hopkinton. We also represent clients in all counties, including Merrimack County, Belknap County, Carroll County, Cheshire County, Coos County, Grafton County, Hillsborough County, Rockingham County, Strafford County and Sullivan County.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this or associated pages, documents, comments, answers, emails, or other communications should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.